<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Global Brain: Tailored Roadmaps For Network-Centric Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openinnovators.net/the-global-brain-tailored-roadmaps-for-network-centric-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openinnovators.net/the-global-brain-tailored-roadmaps-for-network-centric-innovation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philippe De Ridder</title>
		<link>http://www.openinnovators.net/the-global-brain-tailored-roadmaps-for-network-centric-innovation/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe De Ridder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openinnovators.net/the-global-brain-tailored-roadmaps-for-network-centric-innovation/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Hi Abdul-Rahman, Satish sent me his answer via e-mail.

Satish Nambisan: "The network-centric innovation models presented in my book are only meant to provide a broad structure for the innovation initiatives of a company. Companies should choose the appropriate model and then adapt that model and the innovation roles to fit their particular organizational and market context - and as such it also allows and encourages bottom-up, evolutionary implementation. In fact, the key message of our book is that managers should carefully understand the full array of network-centric innovation opportunities and then contextualize those opportunities vis-a-vis the organization's specific innovation goals and processes."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Abdul-Rahman, Satish sent me his answer via e-mail.</p>
<p>Satish Nambisan: &#8220;The network-centric innovation models presented in my book are only meant to provide a broad structure for the innovation initiatives of a company. Companies should choose the appropriate model and then adapt that model and the innovation roles to fit their particular organizational and market context - and as such it also allows and encourages bottom-up, evolutionary implementation. In fact, the key message of our book is that managers should carefully understand the full array of network-centric innovation opportunities and then contextualize those opportunities vis-a-vis the organization&#8217;s specific innovation goals and processes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul-Rahman Advany</title>
		<link>http://www.openinnovators.net/the-global-brain-tailored-roadmaps-for-network-centric-innovation/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul-Rahman Advany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openinnovators.net/the-global-brain-tailored-roadmaps-for-network-centric-innovation/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Quite a interesting interview, I will read the book but I have a question. Do you assume, that by determining certain factors you can construct the right network-centric model? should this approach be a more low level, bottom-up, trail and error way of figuring out what works and what doesn't work. As we know from complex networks, self-organizing systems, enc it is really to dogmatic to start "implementing" a model of network-centric innovation, type of model should be flexible, should be able to adapt, and therefore selection should only be made for the start position (in my opinion). What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a interesting interview, I will read the book but I have a question. Do you assume, that by determining certain factors you can construct the right network-centric model? should this approach be a more low level, bottom-up, trail and error way of figuring out what works and what doesn&#8217;t work. As we know from complex networks, self-organizing systems, enc it is really to dogmatic to start &#8220;implementing&#8221; a model of network-centric innovation, type of model should be flexible, should be able to adapt, and therefore selection should only be made for the start position (in my opinion). What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
