A recent article in the Creativity and Innovation Management journal (March 2008) takes on internet marketplaces for technology such as yet2.com and Innocentive, and shows that there’s still a bumpy road ahead for totally open innovation. Specifically, the success rate has been far lower than expected.

In their study of 25 large Swiss and German firms (on average, 8 457 employees and 2 135 million € in revenue), Ulrich Lichtenthaler and Holger Ernst find that markets for technology have remained imperfect, resulting to high transaction costs and limited adoption by industry incumbents. Although all the firms surveyed were aware of different service providers, and several firms had invested substantial time and resources to decide on their technology offerings, the maximum number of transactions for a single company was only one out-licensing and one in-licensing agreement.

It might be no wonder, therefore, that most industry experts interviewed by Lichtenthaler and Ernst “have relatively reserved attitudes towards these marketplaces”. Only two out of 25 firms wanted to give the internet marketplaces another chance in the short to medium term, while the rest are presumably waiting for the markets to shed their imperfections. Thus, a vicious circle is set up: firms do not want to spend their resources on imperfect markets, while markets remain imperfect as long as firms do not participate more actively.

According to the authors, the most severe deficit is that the commercialization of technology through internet marketplaces constitutes a relatively unsystematic and passive approach. Specific technology needs or customers are not addressed, and problems and solutions are communicated very broadly. This makes matching technologies with buyers difficult, and numbers tell the rest of the tale: in 2004, yet2.com, with its 90 000 registered users, concluded only 10 technology transfers. Companies also tend to publish only relatively unattractive, residual technologies that have limited value, further weakening the attractiveness of using the marketplace. Read the rest of this post >

Interested in Open Innovation & Crowdsourcing? Subscribe to RSS!

In the past, I have made a fairly simple assessment of patents, and their value. I want to revisit this conversation, because I have continued to think about this for months. What is a patent’s value? Copyright? Copying books used to be the norm. Patents are only valuable in a small number of countries. I pose these questions to our readers because I am conflicted in whether or not there should be these protections in the first place. We are in a new world where technology destroys all barriers, and information is shared freely, openly, and transparently. Information should not be the reason one company succeeds and another fails. It should be the perceived value it gives to its customers, something that directly reflects on a corporation’s operations and management. So I call upon our readers to help me answer these questions. Maybe I’ve lost a couple marbles, or maybe the world is changing directly under our feet.

Sadly, my time with Open Innovators has come to a close. If you are in SF, look me up. But thank you for all of the great posts!

Best,

-Emile Read the rest of this post >